Advertisement
THORACIC – Original Submission| Volume 31, ISSUE 2, P301-309, June 2019

Surgical Risk and Survival Associated With Less Invasive Surgery for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma

Published:January 10, 2019DOI:https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semtcvs.2019.01.010
      We compared less invasive surgery with conventional surgery for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients with MPM who received surgery at Hyogo College of Medicine between July 2004 and April 2016. Patients underwent multimodal treatment comprising chemotherapy (neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant) and surgery with or without 54 Gy hemithoracic radiotherapy. Patients were grouped into 3 groups according to the surgery intended: Conventional extrapleural pneumonectomy was intended in Group 1 (until August 2009); less invasive extrapleural pneumonectomy was intended in Group 2 (after September 2009); pleurectomy/decortication was intended in Group 3 (after September 2012). We included 152 patients (median age 64 [37–71] years; 131 men, 21 women), mostly with epithelioid subtypes (91.4%). Of them, 149 (98.0%) underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 117 (77.0%) underwent surgery (60 had extrapleural pneumonectomy and 57 had pleurectomy/decortication). Macroscopic complete resection was achieved in 94.9% (111/117), and the mortality rates at 30 and 90 days were 1.7% (2/117) and 3.4% (4/117), respectively. The overall median survival time and progression-free survival for all 152 patients were 34.9 and 17.4 months. The overall median survival time for Groups 1, 2, and 3 were 18.5, 41.9, and 43.4 months, respectively. The progression-free survival for Groups 1, 2, and 3 were 12.0, 24.5, and 21.8 months, respectively. Compared with conventional surgical techniques, less invasive surgery for MPM yielded lower surgical risks and comparable or improved survival.

      Keywords

      Abbreviations:

      CT (computed tomography), EPP (extrapleural pneumonectomy), FDG-PET (18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography), MPM (malignant pleural mesothelioma), MST (median survival time), P/D (pleurectomy/decortication), PFS (progression-free survival)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Takuwa T.
        • Hasegawa S.
        Current surgical strategies for malignant pleural mesothelioma.
        Surg Today. 2016; 46: 887-894
        • Scherpereel A.
        • Astoul P.
        • Baas P.
        • et al.
        Guidelines of the European Respiratory Society and the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons for the management of malignant pleural mesothelioma.
        Eur Resir J. 2010; 35: 479-495
        • Sugarbaker D.
        Macroscopic complete resection: The goal of primary surgery in multimodality therapy for pleural mesothelioma.
        J Thorac Oncol. 2006; 1: 175-176
        • Rusch V.
        • Baldini E.
        • Bueno R.
        • et al.
        The role of surgical cytoreduction in the treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma: Meeting Summary of the International Mesothelioma Interest Group Congress, September 11–14, 2012, Boston, Mass.
        J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013; 145: 909-910
        • Flores R.
        • Pass H.
        • Seshan V.
        • et al.
        Extrapleural pneumonectomy versus pleurectomy/decortication in the surgical management of malignant pleural mesothelioma: Results in 663 patients.
        J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008; 135 (626 e1–e3): 620-626
        • Treasure T.
        • Lang-Lazdunski L.
        • Waller D.
        • et al.
        Extra-pleural pneumonectomy versus no extra-pleural pneumonectomy for patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma: Clinical outcomes of the Mesothelioma and Radical Surgery (MARS) randomised feasibility study.
        Lancet Oncol. 2011; 12: 763-772
        • Rena O.
        • Casadio C.
        Extrapleural pneumonectomy for early stage malignant pleural mesothelioma: An harmful procedure.
        Lung Cancer. 2012; 77: 151-155
        • Taioli E.
        • Wolf A.
        • Flores R.
        Meta-analysis of survival after pleurectomy decortication versus extrapleural pneumonectomy in mesothelioma.
        Ann Thorac Surg. 2015; 99: 472-480
        • Nakas A.
        • Trousse D.
        • Martin-Ucar A.
        • et al.
        Open lung-sparing surgery for malignant pleural mesothelioma: The benefits of a radical approach within multimodality therapy.
        Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008; 34: 886-891
        • Bolukbas S.
        • Manegold C.
        • Eberlein M.
        • et al.
        Survival after trimodality therapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma: Radical pleurectomy, chemotherapy with cisplatin/pemetrexed and radiotherapy.
        Lung Cancer. 2011; 71: 75-81
        • Lang-Lazdunski L.
        • Bille A.
        • Lal R.
        • et al.
        Pleurectomy/decortication is superior to extrapleural pneumonectomy in the multimodality management of patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma.
        J Thorac Oncol. 2012; 7: 737-743
        • Friedberg J.
        • Culligan M.
        • Mick R.
        • et al.
        Radical pleurectomy and intraoperative photodynamic therapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma.
        Ann Thorac Surg. 2012; 93: 1658-1667
        • Batirel H.
        • Metintas M.
        • Caglar H.
        • et al.
        Adoption of pleurectomy and decortication for malignant mesothelioma leads to similar survival as extrapleural pneumonectomy.
        J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016; 151: 478-484
        • Sharkey A.
        • Tenconi S.
        • Nakas A.
        • et al.
        The effects of an intentional transition from extrapleural pneumonectomy to extended pleurectomy/decortication.
        Eur J Cardiothoracic Surg. 2016; 49: 1632-1641
        • Kameyama K.
        • Huang C.
        • Hayashi E.
        • et al.
        Extended posterolateral-subcostal thoracotomy for extrapleural pneumonectomy: A surgical approach for radical operation of pleural mesothelioma.
        Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2004; 3: 201-203
        • Rusch V.
        A proposed new international TNM staging system for malignant pleural mesothelioma from the International Mesothelioma Interest Group.
        Lung Cancer. 1996; 14: 1-12
        • Hasegawa S.
        Extrapleural pneumonectomy or pleurectomy/decortication for malignant pleural mesothelioma.
        Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014; 62: 516-521
        • Hasegawa S.
        • Okada M.
        • Tanaka F.
        • et al.
        Trimodality strategy for treating malignant pleural mesothelioma: Results of a feasibility study of induction pemetrexed plus cisplatin followed by extrapleural pneumonectomy and postoperative hemithoracic radiation (Japan Mesothelioma Interest Group 0601 Trial).
        Int J Clin Oncol. 2016; 21: 523-530
        • Rice D.
        • Rusch V.
        • Pass H.
        • et al.
        Recommendations for uniform definitions of surgical techniques for malignant pleural mesothelioma. A consensus report of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer International Staging Committee and the International Mesothelioma Interest Group.
        J Thorac Oncol. 2011; 6: 1304-1312
        • Flores R.
        Pleurectomy decortication for mesothelioma: The procedure of choice when possible.
        J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016; 151: 310-312
        • Bolukbas S.
        • Eberlein M.
        • Kudelin N.
        • et al.
        Factors predicting poor survival after lung-sparing radical pleurectomy of IMIG stage III malignant pleural mesothelioma.
        Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013; 44: 119-123
        • Lang-Lazdunski L.
        • Tan C.
        • Treasure T.
        Extrapleural pneumonectomy for malignant mesothelioma: Should pericardium be resected routinely?.
        J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005; 129 (author reply 1202–1203): 1202
        • Sharkey A.
        • Bilancia R.
        • Tenconi S.
        • et al.
        The management of the diaphragm during radical surgery for malignant pleural mesothelioma.
        Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016; 50: 311-316
        • Wolf A.
        • Daniel J.
        • Sugarbaker D.
        Surgical techniques for multimodality treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma: Extrapleural pneumonectomy and pleurectomy/decortication.
        Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009; 21: 132-148
        • Yan T.
        • Boyer M.
        • Tin M.
        • et al.
        Extrapleural pneumonectomy for malignant pleural mesothelioma: Outcomes of treatment and prognostic factors.
        J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009; 138: 619-624
        • Masuda M.
        • Okumura M.
        • et al.
        • Committee for Scientific Affairs TJAfTS
        Thoracic and cardiovascular surgery in Japan during 2014: Annual report by the Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery.
        Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016; 64: 665-697
        • Hasegawa S.
        Early mesothelioma revisited.
        Int J Clin Oncol. 2012; 17: 30-32
        • Hasegawa S.
        • Kondo N.
        • Matsumoto S.
        • et al.
        Practical approaches to diagnose and treat for T0 malignant pleural mesothelioma: A proposal for diagnostic total parietal pleurectomy.
        Int J Clin Oncol. 2012; 17: 33-39

      Linked Article

      • Can Maximally Invasive Surgery Be Minimized?
        Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular SurgeryVol. 31Issue 2
        • Preview
          Patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) have a maximally invasive disease that requires intensive therapy to improve outcomes. Dr Hasegawa et al should be commended for presenting a large series of patients with excellent outcomes and reporting the evolution of their surgical approach over 12 years. While they present a “less invasive surgery” for MPM, the “less” is relative to one of the most invasive operations in thoracic surgery. Even in their experienced hands, the operation remains major undertaking.
        • Full-Text
        • PDF