Graphical Abstract

Keywords
Abbreviations:
AF (atrial fibrillation), BSA (body surface area), CPB (cardiopulmonary bypass), CT (computed tomography scan), ICS (intercostal space), ICU (intensive care unit), MICS (minimally invasive cardiac surgery), NYHA (New York Heart Association), PMA (psoas muscle area)INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS


Surgical Procedure
Early Recovery Protocol After MICS
Study End Point
Surgeons SoT. STS Adult Cardiac Surgery Database. 2019 17 September. Available at: https://www.sts.org/registries-research-center/sts-national-database/sts-adult-cardiac-surgerydatabase. Accessed April, 2021
Statistical Analysis
RESULTS
Patients’ Characteristics
Variables: Mean ± SD or Number (Frequency, %) or Median [IQR] | Sarcopenia Group (n = 92) | Non-sarcopenia Group (n = 275) | P-value |
---|---|---|---|
Average PMA ( | 612.1 ± 194.4 | 895.6 ± 265.1 | <0.001 |
PMA index () | 382.2 ± 95.8 | 556.2 ± 123.2 | <0.001 |
Age (y) | 74.4 ± 5.2 | 72.1 ± 5.4 | <0.001 |
Sex (female) | 55 (59.8) | 165 (60.0) | 1.000 |
Body surface area (㎡) | 1.6 ± 0.2 | 1.6 ± 0.2 | 0.726 |
Body mass index (kg/㎡) | 23.1 [21.0; 24.8] | 23.5 [21.6; 25.6] | 0.208 |
Weight (kg) | 57.8 [49.5; 65.0] | 57.7 [51.0; 65.5] | 0.480 |
Height (m) | 1.57 [1.52; 1.64] | 1.57 [1.52; 1.65] | 0.764 |
Hypertension | 71 (77.2) | 205 (74.5) | 0.714 |
Diabetes mellitus | 29 (31.5) | 77 (28.0) | 0.608 |
Atrial fibrillation | 24 (26.1) | 80 (29.1) | 0.599 |
EuroSCORE II (%) | 4.0 [2.5; 6.5] | 2.9 [1.6; 6.2] | 0.042 |
NYHA functional class | 0.824 | ||
I | 7 (7.6) | 18 (6.5) | |
II | 34 (40.2) | 126 (45.8) | |
III | 30 (32.6) | 83 (30.2) | |
IV | 18 (19.6) | 48 (17.5) | |
Left ventricular ejection fraction (%) | 61.0 ± 9.4 | 61.2 ± 9.3 | 0.826 |
B type natriuretic peptide | 269.0 [131.5; 545.0] | 261.0 [107.0; 606.0] | 0.610 |
Creatinine clearance () | 52.1 ± 22.7 | 52.9 ± 20.2 | 0.747 |
Hemoglobin () | 11.6 ± 2.0 | 12.2 ± 1.9 | 0.006 |
Albumin () | 3.8 ± 0.5 | 4.0 ± 0.5 | 0.001 |
Prior cardiac surgery | 7 (7.6) | 12 (4.4) | 0.345 |
Variables: Mean ± SD or Number (Frequency, %) or Median [IQR] | Sarcopenia Group (n = 92) | Non-sarcopenia Group (n = 275) | P-value |
---|---|---|---|
Incision | 0.298 | ||
Mini-thoracotomy | 76 (82.6) | 241 (87.6) | |
Hemi-sternotomy | 16 (17.4) | 34 (12.4) | |
Aortic valve | 41 (44.6) | 124 (45.1) | 1.000 |
Mitral valve | 21 (22.8) | 70 (25.5) | 0.714 |
Tricuspid valve | 5 (5.4) | 17 (6.2) | 0.994 |
Combined | 15 (16.3) | 40 (14.5) | 0.810 |
Aortic valve and mitral valve | 0 | 3 | 0.736 |
Mitral valve and tricuspid valve | 15 | 35 | 0.490 |
Aortic valve and tricuspid valve | 0 | 2 | 0.998 |
Surgical ablation | 18 (19.6) | 78 (28.4) | 0.127 |
Atrial septal defect closure | 8 (8.7) | 22 (8.0) | 1.000 |
Cardiac tumor | 7 (7.6) | 8 (2.9) | 0.096 |
Cardiopulmonary bypass time (min) | 106.4 ± 41.4 | 109.1 ± 47.4 | 0.624 |
Cardiac ischemic time (min) | 74.8 ± 31.8 | 77.6 ± 33.7 | 0.496 |
Early Clinical Outcomes
Variables: Mean ± SD or Number (Frequency, %) or Median [IQR] | Sarcopenia Group (n = 92) | Non-sarcopenia Group (n = 275) | P-value |
---|---|---|---|
On-table extubation | 41 (44.6) | 147 (53.5) | 0.174 |
Ventilation duration >24 h | 6 (6.5) | 12 (4.4) | 1.000 |
Pneumonia | 3 (3.3) | 7 (2.5) | 1.000 |
Pulmonary complication | 8 (8.7) | 22 (8.0) | 1.000 |
Acute renal failure | 1 (1.1) | 4 (1.5) | 1.000 |
New-onset dialysis | 4 (4.3) | 6 (2.2) | 0.462 |
Low cardiac output syndrome | 17 (18.5) | 62 (22.5) | 0.500 |
VIS_Peak | 14.0 [6.0; 32.5] | 15.0 [7.2; 30.0] | 0.736 |
Mechanical support | 0 (0) | 3 (1.1) | 0.736 |
Stroke | 1 (1.1) | 3 (1.1) | 1.000 |
Atrial fibrillation | 30 (32.6) | 91 (33.1) | 1.000 |
PPM insertion | 0 (0) | 3 (1.1) | 0.736 |
Re-exploration for bleeding | 3 (3.3) | 6 (2.2) | 0.849 |
Need for transfusion | 54 (58.7) | 132 (48.0) | 0.098 |
Chest tube drain during 12 h (ml) | 240.0 [170.0; 384.0] | 280.0 [165.0; 421.5] | 0.352 |
Wound complication | 2 (2.2) | 1 (0.4) | 0.317 |
Intensive care unit stay (h) | 26.0 [23.5; 41.5] | 25.0 [24.0; 29.0] | 0.620 |
Hospital stay (d) | 6.5 [5.0; 8.0] | 6.0 [5.0; 8.0] | 0.280 |
Early mortality | 2 (2.2) | 7 (2.5) | 1.000 |
Early composite outcome | 10 (10.9) | 21 (7.6) | 0.454 |
Impact of Sarcopenia on Late Outcomes

Variable | Univariable | Multivariable | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
HR (95% CI) | P-value | HR (95% CI) | P-value | |
Mortality | ||||
Age, y | 1.07 (1.02-1.13) | 0.005 | 1.02 (0.97-1.08) | 0.426 |
Sex (female) | 0.92 (0.51-1.66) | 0.790 | ||
Body surface area, ㎡ | 0.42 (0.08-2.12) | 0.292 | ||
Sarcopenia | 1.16 (0.61-2.20) | 0.654 | ||
NYHA class 3 or 4 | 2.62 (1.39-4.93) | 0.003 | 2.04 (1.07-3.88) | 0.030 |
Hypertension | 3.25 (1.28-8.24) | 0.013 | 2.52 (0.99-6.45) | 0.054 |
Diabetes | 1.21 (0.64-2.26) | 0.562 | ||
Arterial fibrillation | 3.99 (0.90-17.65) | 0.068 | ||
Cerebrovascular disease | 1.82 (0.87-3.80) | 0.110 | ||
Creatinine clearance, | 0.96 (0.95-0.98) | <0.001 | 0.97 (0.95-0.98) | <0.001 |
Hemoglobin, | 0.83 (0.72-0.97) | 0.020 | 1.11 (0.94-1.31) | 0.231 |
Albumin, | 0.34 (0.20-0.58) | <0.001 | 0.50 (0.28-0.89) | 0.017 |
Previous cardiac surgery | 1.43 (0.44-4.63) | 0.549 | ||
Emergency | 1.78 (0.98-3.22) | 0.057 | ||
Late composite outcome | ||||
Age, y | 1.04 (1.00-1.08) | 0.039 | 1.01 (0.96-1.07) | 0.679 |
Sex (female) | 0.99 (0.64-1.53) | 0.973 | ||
Body surface area, ㎡ | 0.55 (0.24-1.25) | 0.152 | ||
Sarcopenia | 1.07 (0.66-1.73) | 0.797 | ||
NYHA class 3 or 4 | 1.68 (1.08-2.61) | 0.021 | 1.16 (0.63-2.12) | 0.636 |
Hypertension | 2.66 (1.41-5.02) | 0.003 | 2.72 (1.07-6.91) | 0.035 |
Diabetes | 1.53 (0.97-2.40) | 0.066 | ||
Atrial fibrillation | 2.22 (1.02-4.87) | 0.046 | 2.21 (1.01-4.84) | 0.048 |
Cerebrovascular disease | 1.43 (0.84-2.42) | 0.186 | ||
Creatinine clearance, | 0.98 (0.97-0.99) | <0.001 | 0.99 (0.98-1.01) | 0.515 |
Hemoglobin, | 0.89 (0.82-0.97) | 0.008 | 0.98 (0.84-1.14) | 0.757 |
Albumin, | 0.69 (0.52-0.90) | 0.006 | 0.42 (0.24-0.74) | 0.003 |
Previous cardiac surgery | 1.25 (0.51-3.09) | 0.627 | ||
Emergency | 1.27 (0.81-2.02) | 0.295 |
DISCUSSION
LIMITATIONS
CONCLUSION

Acknowledgments
Supplementary Material
- Video 1
Dr. Hyung gon Je present a video summary of the impact of sarcopenia on outcomes of minimally invasive cardiac surgery.
References
- Sarcopenia assessed by the quantity and quality of skeletal muscle is a prognostic factor for patients undergoing cardiac surgery.Surg Today. 2020; 50: 895-904
- The impact of preoperative sarcopenia, defined based on psoas muscle area, on long-term outcomes of heart valve surgery.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019; 157: 1071-9 e3
- Sarcopenia in open heart surgery patients: A cohort study.Heliyon. 2020; 6: e05759
- Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive versus traditional sternotomy mitral valve surgery in elderly patients.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012; 143: S86-S90
- Frailty in elderly people.Lancet. 2013; 381: 752-762
- Sarcopenia.Lancet. 2019; 393: 2636-2646
- Skeletal muscle quality as assessed by CT-derived skeletal muscle density is associated with 6-month mortality in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients.Crit Care. 2016; 20: 386
- Low skeletal muscle area is a risk factor for mortality in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients.Crit Care. 2014; 18: R12
- Minimally invasive cardiac surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Int J Cardiol. 2016; 223: 554-560
- The frailty syndrome: Definition and natural history.Clin Geriatr Med. 2011; 27: 1-15
- Sarcopenia: Burden and challenges for public health.Arch Public Health. 2014; 72: 45
- Impact total psoas volume on short- and long-term outcomes in patients undergoing curative resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A new tool to assess sarcopenia.J Gastrointest Surg. 2015; 19: 1593-1602
- Frailty and risk in proximal aortic surgery.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014; 147 (186-91.e1)
- Prognostic value of fat mass and skeletal muscle mass determined by computed tomography in patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation.Am J Cardiol. 2016; 117: 828-833
- Impact of sarcopenia on outcomes following resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.J Gastrointest Surg. 2012; 16: 1478-1486
- Comparison of computed tomography angiography and transesophageal echocardiography for evaluating aortic arch disease.J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2011; 20: 436-442
- Comparison of del Nido and histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate cardioplegic solutions in minimally invasive cardiac surgery.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020; (S0022-5223:33340-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.11.163)
Surgeons SoT. STS Adult Cardiac Surgery Database. 2019 17 September. Available at: https://www.sts.org/registries-research-center/sts-national-database/sts-adult-cardiac-surgerydatabase. Accessed April, 2021
- Sarcopenia: European consensus on definition and diagnosis: Report of the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People.Age Ageing. 2010; 39: 412-423
- Appendicular skeletal muscle mass: Effects of age, gender, and ethnicity.J Appl Physiol (1985). 1997; 83: 229-239
- Psoas muscle area measured with computed tomography at admission to intensive care unit: Prediction of in-hospital mortality in patients with pulmonary embolism.Biomed Res Int. 2020; 20201586707
- Psoas muscle area and length of stay in older adults undergoing cardiac operations.Ann Thorac Surg. 2017; 103: 1498-1504
- Psoas muscle size predicts risk-adjusted outcomes after surgical aortic valve replacement.Ann Thorac Surg. 2018; 106: 39-45
- Impact of body mass index and albumin on morbidity and mortality after cardiac surgery.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999; 118: 866-873
- Pre-operative serum albumin concentration as a predictor of mortality and morbidity following cardiac surgery.Perfusion. 2013; 28: 390-394
- Impact of preoperative prealbumin on outcomes after cardiac surgery.JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2015; 39: 870-874
- Cardiopulmonary bypass duration is an independent predictor of morbidity and mortality after cardiac surgery.J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2008; 22: 814-822
- Enhanced recovery after cardiac surgery (ERAS Cardiac) recommendations: An important first step-but there is much work to be done.J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2020; 34: 39-47
- Enhanced recovery 5after surgery: A narrative review of its application in cardiac surgery.Ann Thorac Surg. 2020; 109: 1937-1944
Article info
Publication history
Footnotes
IRB Approval: Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital Institutional Review Board, 05-2020-253. The date of IRB approval was December 22, 2020.
Informed consent: Informed consent was waived due to the retrospective study design.
Funding: Nothing to disclose.
Conflicts of Interest: There is no conflict of interest to declare.
Identification
Copyright
User license
Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) |
Permitted
- Read, print & download
- Redistribute or republish the final article
- Text & data mine
- Translate the article
- Reuse portions or extracts from the article in other works
- Sell or re-use for commercial purposes
Elsevier's open access license policy
ScienceDirect
Access this article on ScienceDirectLinked Article
- Commentary: Minimal Invasive Cardiac Surgery Well Tolerated By Sarcopenia Patients: But This is Only One Side of the Medal !Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular SurgeryVol. 35Issue 1
- PreviewThe term sarcopenia was first proposed by Rosenberg in 1988 at a meeting in Albuquerque, New Mexico, where several specialists covened to look at various measurements related to the assessment of health and nutrition in elderly populations. Rosenberg noticed that no decline associated with increasing age is as dramatic or potentially more significant than the decline in lean body mass. In a later published statement, he wrote that "there is no single feature of age-related decline that could more dramatically affect ambulation, mobility, calorie intake, and overall nutrient intake and status, independence, breathing and others”.
- Full-Text
- Preview
- Commentary: Incursion of “Sarcopenia” Into Minimally Invasive Cardiac SurgerySeminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular SurgeryVol. 35Issue 1
- PreviewEver since the term “sarcopenia” was first used in the late 1980s in the context for the concept of age-related loss of function,1 its implications in a wide range of health-related issues have been extensively studied for the last 3 decades, with an exponential expansion in the number of research articles published (Central Figure). Cardiovascular sector has also followed the exactly same pattern, and therefore, I feel it is the “era of sarcopenia” in medical research. More specifically into the heart valve interventions, sarcopenia has reportedly been recognized as a significant contributor for adverse clinical outcomes both in short- and long-terms following aortic valve replacement regardless whether the procedure was undertaken through conventional wide incisions or through least invasive transcatheter approach.
- Full-Text
- Preview